<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>OpenODC on AutoZYX Blog</title><link>https://blog.autozyx.com/en/tags/openodc/</link><description>Recent content in OpenODC on AutoZYX Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.autozyx.com/en/tags/openodc/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Does Intelligent Driving Need an Open Platform for Operating Boundaries?</title><link>https://blog.autozyx.com/en/posts/openodc-driving-boundary-platform/</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.autozyx.com/en/posts/openodc-driving-boundary-platform/</guid><description>When an OEM tells me their intelligent-driving system &amp;#39;works everywhere in the country,&amp;#39; the first thing I want to ask is no longer where it can drive. It&amp;#39;s where it cannot. What weather forces a handover? What about construction zones, standing water, faded lane markings, sensor occlusion? These are not headline-friendly questions, but safety lives in exactly these unglamorous corners. OpenODC is an attempt to take the operating boundaries that are scattered across owner&amp;#39;s manuals, official websites, and government notices and put them on one shared standard, one evidence rule set, one machine-readable schema. It isn&amp;#39;t a leaderboard and it isn&amp;#39;t a certification — it&amp;#39;s a public coordinate system.</description></item></channel></rss>